This weekend I read a post on a blog that an outdoor enthusiast in Connecticut wrote. It was from the Bob Rich Shooting Journal. Bob and I have got to know each other in the last six to nine months or so, by emailing back and forth quite a bit. He emailed me back when my son and I started out outdoor podcast (Up North Journal), and we have been corresponding ever since. Well this last weekend he had an issue while out doing a late season squirrel hunt in the Cromwell Meadows WMA in Connecticut. Here in his own words is what happened:
“As I was leaving the parking lot and rounding the bend, an older woman with 2 big black dogs were walking in the middle of the road and if I wasn’t paying attention, they could have been history. This isn’t the first time I’ve seen this woman and her dogs there, and this time there were two teenage boys with her, playing in the middle of the road in the tunnel. None were wearing blaze and the big black dogs only had on collars.”
Now one of the issues are why do people continually roam state land during hunting season, with no blaze orange on. We are required to wear it when we hunt, so why not them also. Another valid point he brings up is, is this indirectly hunter harassment? He goes on to list several valid reasons for non-hunters to not be allowed into state game areas during hunting season, to roam about.
“Considering how small, few and far between hunting areas are in CT, I think it should be illegal for non-hunters to wander the fields and let their dogs run free. Here’s why:
- They scare the game animals away which in my opinion is hunter harassment.
- They put themselves in danger of being shot and put the hunter in the position of possibly killing someone they couldn’t see.
- When a hunter is surprised by one or more non-hunting dogs running loose in the field, he could be left with a split second decision whether or not to shoot to protect himself.
- The dog could be mistaken for a coyote or other animal and be shot by mistake, getting the hunter legal trouble.
- While hunters are in the field, non-hunters including children have access to the unattended vehicles which may contain guns and ammunition.
- Non-hunters have access to all state hunting land on Sundays when hunters are restricted from hunting. Then why shouldn’t non-hunters be restricted from walking through these areas on the other days?
- Making it illegal for non-hunters to access hunting areas Monday thru Saturday would greatly decrease the possibility of hunter harassment.
Hunters pay to keep these areas open with taxes paid on guns, ammo and licenses. These dog walkers wouldn’t consider letting their dogs run loose on golf courses or ski slopes. So why is our hunting land open to anyone? If the state is unwilling to designate this land for hunting only, they should at least require that everyone wear 400″ of blaze, and dogs should be made to wear blaze and a bell. Maybe I’ll organize a petition this summer to see if we can get the current laws changed.”
On a recent forum, that I browse through regularly, hunters were asking these same questions. Better yet they actually came up with a pretty good idea, I think. Someone suggested that, since we as hunters purchase a license to hunt and use state land, as well as ATV, ORV & boat owners purchase tags or permits (stickers) to ride on state land and waters, why don’t individual states charge people to access the state land as well. If the lady in the situation above, had to purchase a state land “use permit”, she would have to follow the same rules as the other people out hunting (use blaze orange). By forcing people to buy “use permits”, they might consider using a different place to walk their dogs, maybe a nearby park. These lands would not be open to just the free roamers. It would also bring in revenue for the state wildlife agencies, helping out their budgets. This in-turn would help keep license fees lower for us hunters. I like the suggestion above by Bob though. Designate these lands as hunting only during hunting season. We have safe zones in our Michigan state parks & wildlife areas where we are not allowed to hunt even during season, because people frequent these areas with pets and their families.
I can for-see a problem with people saying that everyone should be allowed to use these lands, and I agree, but when your hunt is ruined by someone roaming through your area, you’ll understand why we are talking about this. Like I said before, if we have to buy a license to hunt it why shouldn’t others pay their fair share to use it also.
What do you guys think about this? Let’s get a discussion going, that is how we come up with ideas and get problems solved. Shoot me a comment on the link below.